Steps / Historical AI

Leonhard Euler · 1770 (1828 English ed.) · Internet Archive

Elements of Algebra

All 627 leaves · leaf 187

Transcription

150 ELEMENTS SECT. III. So that $24$ is the greatest common divisor; and consequently the relation $504:312$ is reduced to the form $21:13$. 454. Let the relation $625:529$ be given, and the greatest common divisor of these two numbers be required. $529) 625 (1$ $529$ --- $96) 529 (5$ $480$ --- $49) 96 (1$ $49$ --- $47) 49 (1$ $47$ --- $2) 47 (23$ $46$ --- $1) 2 (2$ $2$ --- $0.$ Wherefore $1$ is, in this case, the greatest common divisor, and consequently we cannot express the relation $625:529$ by less numbers, nor reduce it to simpler terms. 455. It may be necessary, in this place, to give a demonstration of the foregoing Rule. In order to this, let $a$ be the greater, and $b$ the less of the given numbers; and let $d$ be one of their common divisors; it is evident that $a$ and $b$ being divisible by $d$, we may also divide the quantities, $a-b$, $a-2b$, $a-3b$, and, in general, $a-nb$ by $d$. 456. The converse is no less true: that is, if the numbers $b$ and $a-nb$ are divisible by $d$, the number $a$ will also be divisible by $d$; for $nb$ being divisible by $d$, we could not divide $a-nb$ by $d$, if $a$ were not also divisible by $d$. 457. We observe farther, that if $d$ be the greatest common divisor of two numbers, $b$, and $a-nb$, it will also be the greatest common divisor of the two numbers $a$ and $b$; for if a greater common divisor than $d$ could be found for these numbers $a$ and $b$, that number would also be a common divisor of $b$ and $a-nb$; and consequently $d$ would not be the greatest common divisor of these two numbers; but we have supposed $d$ to be the greatest divisor common to $b$ and
confidence 0.98 54 expressions source scan at the Internet Archive

This text was produced by machine and has not been corrected by hand. Where it matters, read the scan. Confidence is the model's own, not an external check.