Steps / Historical AI

Leonhard Euler · 1770 (1828 English ed.) · Internet Archive

Elements of Algebra

All 627 leaves · leaf 70

Transcription

CHAP. X. OF ALGEBRA. 33 we must have recourse to the method already mentioned for reducing them to a common denominator. Let there be, for example, the fraction $\frac{a}{b}$ to be divided by the fraction $\frac{c}{d}$. We first reduce them to the same denominator, and there results $\frac{ad}{bd}$ to be divided by $\frac{cb}{db}$; it is now evident that the quotient must be represented simply by the division of $ad$ by $bc$; which gives $\frac{ad}{bc}$. Hence the following rule: Multiply the numerator of the dividend by the denominator of the divisor, and the denominator of the dividend by the numerator of the divisor; then the first product will be the numerator of the quotient, and the second will be its denominator. 109. Applying this rule to the division of $\frac{1}{2}$ by $\frac{2}{3}$, we shall have the quotient $\frac{3}{4}$: also the division of $\frac{3}{4}$ by $\frac{1}{2}$ will give $\frac{6}{4}$, or $\frac{3}{2}$, or $1\frac{1}{2}$; and $\frac{25}{48}$ by $\frac{5}{6}$ will give $\frac{150}{240}$, or $\frac{5}{8}$. 110. This rule for division is often expressed in a manner that is more easily remembered, as follows: Invert the terms of the divisor, so that the denominator may be in the place of the numerator, and the latter be written under the line; then multiply the fraction, which is the dividend by this inverted fraction, and the product will be the quotient sought. Thus, $\frac{3}{4}$ divided by $\frac{1}{2}$ is the same as multiplied by $\frac{2}{1}$, which makes $\frac{6}{4}$, or $1\frac{1}{2}$. Also $\frac{5}{8}$ divided by $\frac{2}{3}$ is the same as $\frac{5}{8}$ multiplied by $\frac{3}{2}$, which is $\frac{15}{16}$; or $\frac{25}{48}$ divided by $\frac{5}{6}$ gives the same as $\frac{25}{48}$ multiplied by $\frac{6}{5}$, the product of which is $\frac{150}{240}$, or $\frac{5}{8}$. We see then, in general, that to divide by the fraction $\frac{1}{2}$ is the same as to multiply by $\frac{2}{1}$, or $2$; and that dividing by $\frac{1}{3}$ amounts to multiplying by $\frac{3}{1}$, or by $3$, \ldots 111. The number $100$ divided by $\frac{1}{2}$ will give $200$; and $1000$ divided by $\frac{1}{3}$ will give $3000$. Farther, if it were required to divide $1$ by $\frac{1}{1000}$, the quotient would be $1000$; and dividing $1$ by $\frac{1}{100000}$, the quotient is $100000$. This enables us to conceive that, when any number is divided by $0$, the result must be a number indefinitely great; for even the division of $1$ by the small fraction $\frac{1}{1000000000}$ gives for the quotient the very great number $1000000000$. 112. Every number, when divided by itself, producing unity, it is evident that a fraction divided by itself must also give $1$ for the quotient; and the same follows from our rule: for, in order to divide $\frac{3}{4}$ by $\frac{3}{4}$, we must multiply $\frac{3}{4}$ by $\frac{4}{3}$, in D
confidence 1.00 62 expressions source scan at the Internet Archive

This text was produced by machine and has not been corrected by hand. Where it matters, read the scan. Confidence is the model's own, not an external check.